Search for: All records

Cellular signaling networks are modulated by multiple protein-protein interaction domains that coordinate extracellular inputs and processes to regulate cellular processes. Several of these domains recognize short linear motifs, or SLiMs, which are often highly conserved and are closely regulated. One such domain, the Src homology 3 (SH3) domain, typically recognizes proline-rich SLiMs and is one of the most abundant SLiM-binding domains in the human proteome. These domains are often described as quiteversatile, and indeed, SH3 domains can bind ligands in opposite orientations dependent on target sequence. Furthermore, recent work has identified diverse modes of binding for SH3 domains and a wide variety of sequence motifs that are recognized by various domains. Specificity is often attributed to the RT and nSrc loops near the peptide-binding cleft in this domain family, particularly for Class I binding, which is defined as RT and nSrc loop interactions with the N-terminus of the ligand. Here, we used the Src and Abl SH3 domains as a model to further investigate the role of the RT and nSrc loops in SH3 specificity. We created chimeric domains with both the RT and nSrc loop sequences swapped between these SH3 domains, and used fluorescence anisotropy assays to test how relative binding affinities were affected for Src SH3- and Abl SH3-specific ligands. We also used Alphafold–Multimer to model our SH3:peptide complexes in combination with molecular dynamics simulations. We identified a position that contributes to the nSrc loop conformation in Src SH3, the amino acid immediately following a highly conserved Trp that creates a hydrophobic pocket critical for SH3 ligand recognition. We defined this as the WX motif, where X = Trp for Src and Cys for Abl. A broad importance of this position for modulating nSrc loop conformation in SH3 domains is suggested by analyses of previously deposited SH3 structures, multiple sequence alignment of SH3 domains in the human proteome, and our biochemical and computational data of mutant Src and Abl SH3 domains. Overall, our work uses experimental approaches and structural modeling to better understand specificity determinants in SH3 domains. 

Vogelet al.reveals the stereochemical basis of alternative substrate cleavage byS. pyogenesSrtA for ligands with a P1′ Leu residue. The substrate adopts puckered alternative binding, whereby cleavage occurs between the P1′ and P2′ positions. 

Abstract Protein–protein interactions that involve recognition of short peptides are critical in cellular processes. Protein–peptide interaction surface areas are relatively small and shallow, and there are often overlapping specificities in families of peptide‐binding domains. Therefore, dissecting selectivity determinants can be challenging. PDZ domains are a family of peptide‐binding domains located in several intracellular signaling and trafficking pathways. These domains are also directly targeted by pathogens, and a hallmark of many oncogenic viral proteins is a PDZ‐binding motif. However, amidst sequences that target PDZ domains, there is a wide spectrum in relative promiscuity. For example, the viral HPV16 E6 oncoprotein recognizes over double the number of PDZ domain‐containing proteins as the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) in the cell, despite similar PDZ targeting‐sequences and identical motif residues. Here, we determine binding affinities for PDZ domains known to bind either HPV16 E6 alone or both CFTR and HPV16 E6, using peptides matching WT and hybrid sequences. We also use energy minimization to model PDZ–peptide complexes and use sequence analyses to investigate this difference. We find that while the majority of single mutations had marginal effects on overall affinity, the additive effect on the free energy of binding accurately describes the selectivity observed. Taken together, our results describe how complex and differing PDZ interactomes can be programmed in the cell.